Systematic ReviewResearchWorkflowQuality Improvement

Nurse-delivered geriatric ED care showed benefits, but evidence quality was modest

International emergency nursing (PubMed)Aug 25, 2026

AI-summarized from the linked source. Educational brief, not medical advice.

Brief summary

A systematic review of 33 studies found several nurse-delivered geriatric emergency care strategies were associated with better care outcomes, with the most consistent benefits reported when geriatric nurse specialists worked with multidisciplinary teams.

What NurseJet pulled from the source

The review examined 33 studies published since 2014 involving adults aged 65 years or older. Multidisciplinary teams, geriatric nurse specialists, screening, and geriatric assessment were associated with improvements in admission, discharge, or functional-decline outcomes. Findings for ED revisits and hospital length of stay were less consistent, especially in higher-quality studies.

Why this matters for nurses

Older adults often arrive with overlapping medical, functional, cognitive, medication, and social needs that a single-condition ED model can miss. The review supports nursing involvement in structured geriatric assessment and team-based planning while showing that not every utilization outcome improves consistently.

Bedside takeaway

Structured geriatric nursing assessment and multidisciplinary collaboration appear useful, but effects on revisits and length of stay remain inconsistent.

How This Applies in Practice

Use this when: Assessing an older adult in the ED who may have functional, cognitive, medication, or discharge-planning needs beyond the acute complaint.

On your shift

Complete the facility-approved geriatric risk screen and document functional, cognitive, mobility, medication, and support concerns.
Refer identified needs to the geriatric specialist or multidisciplinary pathway available in the organization.
Include caregiver input and unresolved safety or follow-up needs in handoff and discharge communication.

Keep in mind: The review does not identify one universally effective model. Follow local geriatric-care and discharge policies and provider orders.

Key takeaways

The review included 33 studies of nurse-delivered ED interventions for adults aged 65 years or older.
Evaluated approaches included geriatric screening and assessment, specialist nurses, multidisciplinary teams, pathway changes, and discharge planning.
Combining geriatric nurse specialists with multidisciplinary teams produced the most consistent benefits.
Evidence for reducing ED revisits or hospital length of stay was inconsistent, and overall evidence quality was modest.

Practice implications

Use the approved geriatric screening and assessment pathway, identify functional or cognitive concerns and discharge risks, and communicate findings to the multidisciplinary team. Avoid assuming that one intervention will reliably prevent revisits or shorten hospitalization.

Limitations & cautions

Evidence quality was modest, interventions and outcomes differed across 33 studies, and improvements in revisits and length of stay were inconsistent. The abstract does not support selecting one universal geriatric ED model.
AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Citations

Exact source links

Open source

Public citations are filtered to exact credible source pages. Homepage-only or invalid links stay in admin review and are not shown here.

International emergency nursing (PubMed)

International emergency nursing (PubMed). Impact of nurse-delivered geriatric intervention in the emergency department: A systematic review.

Open original source

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42641193/

Professional education only

This summary does not replace clinical judgment, facility policy, provider orders, or official guidelines. Verify practice changes against the original source and local protocol.

Related briefs

More updates for this clinical area

Back to Discover

Pediatric emergency care (PubMed)Sep 7, 2026Research Article

A double-blind randomized trial found no reduction in vomiting or faster oral tolerance with intravenous pantoprazole versus placebo in children with acute gastroenteritis and persistent vomiting after ondansetron.

Peds EmergencyAI summaryReview source

Research ArticleResearchMedication SafetyAI summary · original source linked below

The trial randomized 100 children. Vomiting episodes and oral tolerance at 6 and 12 hours did not differ significantly, while median hospital stay was 2 days with pantoprazole and 1 day with placebo.

Key takeaways

The median participant age was 14 months, and 67% of participants were male.
Oral tolerance at 12 hours was 86% in both groups.
The longer stay associated with pantoprazole requires cautious interpretation because this was a single-center trial.

Why this matters on shift

The trial does not support empiric intravenous proton-pump inhibition for persistent vomiting in pediatric acute gastroenteritis after ondansetron.

Bedside takeaway

Clarify the indication for empiric acid suppression and keep hydration and oral-tolerance assessment central to care.

Nursing implications

Prioritize the ordered hydration and oral-tolerance plan, document ongoing emesis, and clarify the indication before administering empiric acid suppression.

Limitations & cautions

Abstract-only summary. This was a single-center study of 100 children in Tehran, and the abstract does not describe adverse events or explain why hospitalization was longer in the pantoprazole group.
AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Citations · exact source links

Pediatric emergency care (PubMed). Effect of Intravenous Pantoprazole on Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Acute Gastroenteritis: A Placebo-Controlled RCT.

Open original sourceFull brief

AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology (PubMed)Sep 4, 2026Research Article

A five-center randomized trial found similar rescue-opioid use and moderate-to-severe PACU pain with dexmedetomidine-based opioid-sparing analgesia and fentanyl-based analgesia during elective craniotomy for brain tumors.

Emergency ICUAI summaryReview source

Research ArticleResearchMedication SafetyAI summary · original source linked below

The trial randomized 500 adults. Moderate-to-severe PACU pain occurred in 145 of 242 assessed participants in the fentanyl group and 138 of 233 in the dexmedetomidine group, with no significant difference.

Key takeaways

Intraoperative rescue fentanyl use did not differ significantly between groups.
Hypotension was more common with dexmedetomidine, while postoperative shivering was less common.
Other in-hospital outcomes were similar between the two regimens.

Why this matters on shift

An opioid-sparing label did not translate into better early pain control in this trial, and the differing hypotension and shivering profiles remain relevant during perioperative handoff and recovery monitoring.

Bedside takeaway

Monitor pain, hemodynamics, sedation, and shivering in relation to the analgesic regimen and local protocol.

Nursing implications

During PACU and postoperative handoff, monitor pain, hemodynamics, sedation, and shivering according to the administered regimen and local protocol.

Limitations & cautions

Abstract-only summary. The trial involved elective tumor craniotomy at five Indian centers, both groups also received locoregional analgesia, and the abstract does not provide longer-term outcome results in detail.
AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Citations · exact source links

Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology (PubMed). Opioid-Sparing Versus Opioid-Based Analgesia for Craniotomy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Open original sourceFull brief

AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (PubMed)Sep 5, 2026Research Article

A prospective Dutch nursing-home cohort found clinically important differences in illness burden across respiratory viruses, with influenza and human metapneumovirus standing out.

Geriatrics Med-SurgAI summaryReview source

Research ArticleResearchInfection ControlAI summary · original source linked below

Among 3,195 residents at 15 nursing homes, 526 suspected acute respiratory-infection episodes were recorded and a virus was identified in 291. Influenza A was associated with delayed recovery, oxygen use, and threefold secondary-bacterial-pneumonia risk; hMPV was linked to fourfold more time in bed.

Key takeaways

SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, rhinovirus or enterovirus, and RSV were the most frequently identified viruses.
hMPV and RSV tended to have higher odds of moderate or severe disease.
Virus-specific patterns were associations from a cohort, not randomized comparisons.

Why this matters on shift

Frailty can amplify respiratory-infection consequences, and the causative virus may help anticipate recovery, oxygen, mobility, and secondary-infection needs.

Bedside takeaway

Trend oxygen needs, mobility, recovery, and secondary-pneumonia signs during nursing-home respiratory infections.

Nursing implications

During outbreaks or suspected infection, trend oxygen needs, mobility and time in bed, recovery, and signs of bacterial pneumonia according to facility protocols.

Limitations & cautions

Abstract-only summary. Data came from 15 Dutch nursing homes, the overall suspected-infection risk estimate was imprecise, and virus-outcome comparisons may be affected by confounding and small subgroup counts.
AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Citations · exact source links

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (PubMed). Clinical Impact of Acute Respiratory Virus Infections in Nursing Home Residents.

Open original sourceFull brief

AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

How This Applies in Practice

Key takeaways

Practice implications

Limitations & cautions

Exact source links

More updates for this clinical area

IV pantoprazole did not improve vomiting or oral tolerance in pediatric gastroenteritis

Dexmedetomidine did not improve early pain outcomes versus fentanyl for craniotomy

Influenza and hMPV carried substantial illness burden in nursing home residents