Research ArticleResearchMedication Safety

Steroid-vitamin combination did not improve neuronal injury after cardiac arrest

EClinicalMedicine (PubMed)Sep 5, 2026

AI-summarized from the linked source. Educational brief, not medical advice.

Brief summary

A multicenter phase 2 randomized trial found that early hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid, and thiamine did not reduce a biomarker of neuronal injury or improve 180-day outcomes in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

What NurseJet pulled from the source

Among 160 randomized adults receiving targeted temperature management, peak neuron-specific enolase did not differ significantly between treatment and placebo. Survival and good neurological outcome at 180 days were also similar.

Why this matters for nurses

Post-arrest critical care includes close neurological, hemodynamic, and metabolic monitoring. This trial does not support adding this three-drug combination empirically for neuroprotection.

Bedside takeaway

The STAR trial does not support empiric steroid, vitamin C, and thiamine neuroprotection after cardiac arrest.

Key takeaways

Participants received hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid, and thiamine every 12 hours for three days or placebo.
Peak neuron-specific enolase was 47.4 ng/mL with treatment and 53.3 ng/mL with placebo (median difference -5.9 ng/mL; 95% CI -34.5 to 40.8; p=0.54).
Serious adverse events were comparable, and none were judged related to the study medication.

Practice implications

Use medications and targeted temperature management according to the approved post-arrest protocol and provider orders; this study does not establish benefit from empiric hydrocortisone, vitamin C, and thiamine for neuroprotection.

Limitations & cautions

Abstract-only summary. This phase 2 trial included 160 adults at four South Korean hospitals, bedside clinicians were not masked, and the primary endpoint was a biomarker rather than a patient-centered outcome.
AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Citations

Exact source links

Open source

Public citations are filtered to exact credible source pages. Homepage-only or invalid links stay in admin review and are not shown here.

EClinicalMedicine (PubMed)

EClinicalMedicine (PubMed). Steroid, thiamine, and ascorbic acid for comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors (STAR): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

Open original source

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42733931/

Professional education only

This summary does not replace clinical judgment, facility policy, provider orders, or official guidelines. Verify practice changes against the original source and local protocol.

Related briefs

More updates for this clinical area

Back to Discover

Journal of Clinical Nursing (PubMed)Aug 13, 2026Systematic Review

A mixed-methods systematic review found that nurses viewed situational awareness, teamwork, communication, leadership, experience, intuition, and freedom from retribution as important to recognizing and escalating clinical deterioration.

Leadership Med-SurgAI summaryReview source

Systematic ReviewResearchQuality ImprovementWorkflowAI summary · original source linked below

The review synthesized 24 primary studies and identified six themes. Supportive team culture and strong communication facilitated recognition and escalation, while inexperience and fear of criticism delayed action; the review did not pool patient outcomes.

Key takeaways

Recognizing deterioration involved more than detecting abnormal physiological parameters.
Less-experienced nurses described barriers when team culture devalued their concerns or made escalation feel unsafe.
The authors called for non-technical skills to be integrated into deterioration-response frameworks alongside early warning and rapid-response systems.

Why this matters on shift

Nurse educators and unit leaders can strengthen escalation systems by pairing clinical criteria with communication practice, team behaviors, and explicit psychological safety. The evidence describes nurses' perceptions, so it should guide local assessment and education rather than be treated as proof of a specific training program's effect.

Bedside takeaway

Pair objective deterioration criteria with clear communication and a speaking-up culture that supports escalation from every experience level.

Nursing implications

Use the facility's early-warning and escalation pathway, state objective changes and concerns clearly, and escalate again when the patient's trajectory remains concerning. Educators and leaders should rehearse speaking-up and response behaviors while preserving required clinical criteria and provider notification steps.

Limitations & cautions

This was an integrated narrative synthesis of nurses' perceptions across heterogeneous studies, without meta-analysis. It does not quantify how a particular education or culture intervention changes clinical outcomes.
AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Citations · exact source links

Journal of Clinical Nursing (PubMed). Nurses' Perceptions of Their Non-Technical Skills in Recognising and Responding to Clinical Deterioration in Hospital Settings: A Systematic Review.

Open original sourceFull brief

AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Journal of Neurology (PubMed)Sep 20, 2026Systematic Review

A systematic review characterized cancer-associated coagulopathy stroke as an underrecognized ischemic stroke mechanism linked to advanced cancer, early recurrence, and poor outcomes.

Emergency OncologyAI summaryReview source

Systematic ReviewResearchMedication SafetyWorkflowAI summary · original source linked below

The qualitative review included 82 studies. Cancer-associated coagulopathy stroke occurred predominantly within six months of cancer diagnosis, most often with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma; D-dimer was the biomarker most consistently associated with recurrence and mortality, and reported 30-day mortality ranged from 25% to 50%.

Key takeaways

Lung and pancreatic adenocarcinomas were the histologic subtypes most frequently associated with cancer-related coagulopathy stroke.
Multiple infarcts across more than two vascular territories were a characteristic imaging pattern described in the review.
Low-molecular-weight heparin and direct oral anticoagulants were commonly used for secondary prevention, but the review did not establish one optimal antithrombotic strategy.

Why this matters on shift

Neuro and oncology nurses may be first to recognize a new focal deficit or recurrent neurologic change in a patient with active cancer. The review highlights a high-risk stroke mechanism that requires rapid assessment while leaving treatment selection to individualized multidisciplinary evaluation.

Bedside takeaway

Escalate new neurologic deficits immediately and communicate the patient's cancer and antithrombotic context to the stroke team.

Nursing implications

Treat any new focal neurologic deficit as an emergency, document onset and progression precisely, and promptly communicate active or metastatic cancer, recent cancer diagnosis, coagulation results, and current antithrombotic therapy to the stroke team. Follow facility stroke and anticoagulation protocols and provider orders.

Limitations & cautions

The review synthesized heterogeneous studies qualitatively and did not report a pooled treatment comparison. Biomarkers other than D-dimer had limited specificity, and the abstract does not support choosing one anticoagulant or screening strategy.
AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Citations · exact source links

Journal of Neurology (PubMed). Stroke secondary to cancer-associated coagulopathy: a systematic review.

Open original sourceFull brief

AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (PubMed)Sep 10, 2026Research Article

An assessor-blinded randomized trial found no significant advantage for a sensor-assisted soft robotic glove over supervised repetitive arm training during inpatient stroke rehabilitation.

EmergencyAI summaryReview source

Research ArticleResearchWorkflowAI summary · original source linked below

The trial randomized 61 adults with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke and unilateral arm impairment; 58 completed the post-intervention assessment. Both groups improved after up to 15 sessions, but no statistically significant between-group differences were found in the primary or secondary outcomes.

Key takeaways

Participants received either robotic-glove training or supervised GRASP training for 30 to 45 minutes per session, up to five days weekly for three weeks.
A post-hoc subgroup signal for distal hand recovery favored the glove immediately after treatment but was not present at three months.
The trial stopped before reaching its planned sample size and was underpowered for the prespecified between-group difference.

Why this matters on shift

Rehabilitation nurses reinforce prescribed practice, monitor tolerance, and help patients carry therapy goals into daily activity. The result does not support assuming that a robotic device is superior to a structured, supervised exercise program.

Bedside takeaway

Do not assume a robotic glove is better than structured supervised practice; follow the individualized stroke-rehabilitation plan.

Nursing implications

Follow the individualized rehabilitation plan, help patients complete ordered repetitive upper-limb practice safely, and document fatigue, pain, skin issues, or barriers to participation. Present robotic devices as one possible therapy tool, not as proven superior treatment.

Limitations & cautions

The trial was underpowered after recruitment stopped for funding constraints. The exploratory subgroup finding was post hoc, involved 38 participants, and did not persist at three months; the device manufacturer was involved in funding and supplied the device.
AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Citations · exact source links

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (PubMed). Efficacy of a soft robotic exoskeleton for upper-limb rehabilitation in subacute stroke inpatient rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial.

Open original sourceFull brief

AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Key takeaways

Practice implications

Limitations & cautions

Exact source links

More updates for this clinical area

Psychological safety and communication shaped nurses' escalation of deterioration

Cancer-associated coagulopathy stroke carried high early recurrence and mortality risk

A soft robotic glove did not outperform supervised stroke arm training