Research ArticleResearchMedication SafetyWorkflow

A structured adverse-drug-reaction profile helped surface medication problems in one small trial

PLOS One (PubMed)Sep 18, 2026

AI-summarized from the linked source. Educational brief, not medical advice.

Brief summary

In a small cluster-randomized primary-care trial, use of the Adverse Drug Reaction Profile was associated with more clinical problems being addressed among adults aged 65 or older taking more than four long-term medicines.

What NurseJet pulled from the source

The trial enrolled 60 patients across six practices in one general-practice group, with three lost to follow-up. More intervention patients than control patients had more than one problem addressed (22 of 27 versus 11 of 30; adjusted OR 7.48), while clinicians raised concerns about staff time.

Why this matters for nurses

Older adults with polypharmacy may normalize symptoms or leave adverse effects unreported during routine visits. A structured symptom review may help nurses and pharmacists connect patient concerns with medication review, but this pilot-scale result is not enough to mandate one tool.

Bedside takeaway

A structured symptom review can strengthen medication reconciliation, but suspected adverse effects still require pharmacist or prescriber review.

Key takeaways

Patients completed a structured adverse-effect profile that was shared with the practice pharmacist and repeated with a nurse researcher after 20 weeks.
The study found more documented problems addressed in the intervention group, including medication-related referrals and reviews.
The estimate was imprecise and came from one small practice group, so effectiveness and workflow burden need confirmation in larger settings.

Practice implications

During medication reconciliation, ask systematically about new or persistent symptoms, document timing and functional impact, and escalate suspected adverse effects to the pharmacist or prescriber. Do not stop or change long-term medicines outside provider orders and facility policy.

Limitations & cautions

Only 60 patients from six practices within one general-practice group were enrolled, three were lost to follow-up, and the confidence interval around the primary estimate was wide. The abstract reports process and clinical-problem outcomes rather than hospitalization or mortality outcomes.
AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Citations

Exact source links

Open source

Public citations are filtered to exact credible source pages. Homepage-only or invalid links stay in admin review and are not shown here.

PLOS One (PubMed)

PLOS One (PubMed). "A better system" - managing the adverse effects of prescribed medicines: Cluster-randomised controlled trial and process evaluation of the ADRe Profile in primary care.

Open original source

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42758689/

Professional education only

This summary does not replace clinical judgment, facility policy, provider orders, or official guidelines. Verify practice changes against the original source and local protocol.

Related briefs

More updates for this clinical area

Back to Discover

Family Medicine and Community Health (PubMed)Sep 22, 2026Systematic Review

A dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohorts found that higher ultra-processed food intake was associated with higher risks of cardiovascular events, cancer, obesity or overweight, metabolic syndrome or diabetes, depression or anxiety, digestive disease, and all-cause mortality.

Med-Surg TelemetryAI summaryReview source

Systematic ReviewResearchPatient EducationAI summary · original source linked below

The review included 51 prospective cohort studies with 8,819,894 adults. Each additional 100 g/day of ultra-processed food was associated with higher risks of cardiovascular events, cancer, all-cause mortality, and metabolic syndrome or diabetes, but the authors rated the evidence as low or moderate.

Key takeaways

The pooled comparison associated higher ultra-processed food intake with a 24% higher hazard of cardiovascular events and an 18% higher hazard of all-cause mortality.
Diet exposure was measured with food-frequency questionnaires, 24-hour recalls, or dietary histories rather than a standardized intervention.
These prospective observational associations do not establish that ultra-processed food caused the reported outcomes.

Why this matters on shift

Nurses frequently reinforce nutrition plans during chronic-disease education and discharge teaching. This broad evidence synthesis supports discussing food-processing patterns as one part of individualized education while avoiding causal claims or rigid advice based on one dietary measure.

Bedside takeaway

Use processing patterns as one part of individualized nutrition teaching, and describe the evidence as associative rather than causal.

Nursing implications

When nutrition teaching is within the care plan, assess the patient's usual foods and access barriers, reinforce the dietitian or clinical team's recommendations, and use teach-back. Avoid presenting this observational review as proof that one food category caused an individual patient's disease.

Limitations & cautions

The evidence came from prospective cohorts rather than randomized dietary interventions, intake measurement varied, and residual confounding is possible. The authors rated the evidence as low or moderate, so the hazard ratios describe associations rather than causal effects.
AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Citations · exact source links

Family Medicine and Community Health (PubMed). Ultra-processed food consumption and risk of multiple chronic diseases among 8,819,894 adults from 51 prospective cohorts: a dose-response meta-analysis.

Open original sourceFull brief

AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Journal of Clinical Nursing (PubMed)Aug 13, 2026Systematic Review

A mixed-methods systematic review found that nurses viewed situational awareness, teamwork, communication, leadership, experience, intuition, and freedom from retribution as important to recognizing and escalating clinical deterioration.

Leadership Med-SurgAI summaryReview source

Systematic ReviewResearchQuality ImprovementWorkflowAI summary · original source linked below

The review synthesized 24 primary studies and identified six themes. Supportive team culture and strong communication facilitated recognition and escalation, while inexperience and fear of criticism delayed action; the review did not pool patient outcomes.

Key takeaways

Recognizing deterioration involved more than detecting abnormal physiological parameters.
Less-experienced nurses described barriers when team culture devalued their concerns or made escalation feel unsafe.
The authors called for non-technical skills to be integrated into deterioration-response frameworks alongside early warning and rapid-response systems.

Why this matters on shift

Nurse educators and unit leaders can strengthen escalation systems by pairing clinical criteria with communication practice, team behaviors, and explicit psychological safety. The evidence describes nurses' perceptions, so it should guide local assessment and education rather than be treated as proof of a specific training program's effect.

Bedside takeaway

Pair objective deterioration criteria with clear communication and a speaking-up culture that supports escalation from every experience level.

Nursing implications

Use the facility's early-warning and escalation pathway, state objective changes and concerns clearly, and escalate again when the patient's trajectory remains concerning. Educators and leaders should rehearse speaking-up and response behaviors while preserving required clinical criteria and provider notification steps.

Limitations & cautions

This was an integrated narrative synthesis of nurses' perceptions across heterogeneous studies, without meta-analysis. It does not quantify how a particular education or culture intervention changes clinical outcomes.
AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Citations · exact source links

Journal of Clinical Nursing (PubMed). Nurses' Perceptions of Their Non-Technical Skills in Recognising and Responding to Clinical Deterioration in Hospital Settings: A Systematic Review.

Open original sourceFull brief

AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Journal of Advanced Nursing (PubMed)Aug 4, 2026Systematic Review

A systematic review and meta-analysis found moderate-certainty evidence that nurse-led or nurse-coordinated multicomponent nonpharmacologic programs reduced delirium incidence in hospitalized adults aged 60 or older.

Geriatrics Med-SurgAI summaryReview source

Systematic ReviewResearchQuality ImprovementWorkflowAI summary · original source linked below

The review included 21 randomized or quasi-experimental studies with 6,354 participants. Interventions targeting at least two delirium risk factors reduced delirium incidence by 36% relative to control and were also associated with shorter delirium duration, fewer falls, and shorter length of stay.

Key takeaways

The pooled risk ratio for delirium incidence was 0.64 with no measured between-study heterogeneity for that outcome.
Hospital Elder Life Program-based protocols had the largest subgroup estimate, with a risk ratio of 0.58.
Subgroup and meta-regression analyses did not identify statistically significant moderators of the intervention effect.

Why this matters on shift

Bedside nurses deliver many delirium-prevention components, including orientation, mobility support, sleep promotion, hydration, sensory support, and medication-risk communication. The review supports coordinated bundles rather than relying on a single isolated action.

Bedside takeaway

Apply the approved multicomponent delirium-prevention bundle consistently and escalate acute cognitive change promptly.

Nursing implications

Use the facility's approved delirium-prevention bundle, screen and document risk or new cognitive change, and coordinate ordered mobility, hydration, sleep, orientation, and sensory-support measures. Escalate acute changes and follow local fall, medication, and provider-order protocols.

Limitations & cautions

The synthesis combined randomized and quasi-experimental designs and multicomponent programs that may differ by setting. The abstract reports moderate certainty and does not show that every component or implementation model has the same effect.
AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Citations · exact source links

Journal of Advanced Nursing (PubMed). Nurse-Led Multicomponent Interventions for Delirium Prevention in Hospitalised Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Open original sourceFull brief

AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Key takeaways

Practice implications

Limitations & cautions

Exact source links

More updates for this clinical area

Higher ultra-processed food intake was associated with multiple chronic diseases

Psychological safety and communication shaped nurses' escalation of deterioration

Nurse-led multicomponent programs reduced delirium in hospitalized older adults