NurseJet
Back to Discover
Systematic ReviewResearchWorkflow

Intensive blood-pressure lowering after stroke reperfusion probably increased mortality without meaningful functional benefit

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (PubMed)Jul 14, 2026

AI-summarized from the linked source. Educational brief, not medical advice.

Brief summary

A Cochrane review of nine randomized trials involving 4,381 adults found that intensive systolic targets below 160 mmHg after ischemic-stroke reperfusion produced no clinically meaningful functional or hemorrhage benefit and probably increased all-cause mortality.

What NurseJet pulled from the source

This Cochrane review compared intensive systolic blood-pressure targets below 160 mmHg with conventional targets, generally below 180 mmHg, after thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke. Nine randomized trials included 4,381 participants. Intensive management produced little to no clinically meaningful difference in functional outcomes and did not change the risk of any intracranial hemorrhage (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.14). It probably increased all-cause mortality (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.32) and probably reduced the proportion of participants with favorable neurologic status, although the estimate included the possibility of little difference. The review does not support assuming that a lower post-reperfusion target is safer or more effective for every patient.

Why this matters for nurses

Stroke and critical-care nurses repeatedly measure blood pressure, assess neurologic status, administer ordered antihypertensives, and escalate deviations after reperfusion. This review matters because it challenges the intuitive assumption that pushing systolic pressure lower than conventional targets necessarily improves recovery.

Bedside takeaway

Be aware that intensive systolic targets below 160 mmHg after stroke reperfusion probably increased mortality without meaningful functional or hemorrhage benefit.

How This Applies in Practice

Use this when: Caring for an adult after thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy under an approved post-reperfusion blood-pressure pathway.

On your shift

  • Confirm the ordered systolic target and treatment threshold instead of assuming that the most intensive target is preferred.
  • Trend blood pressure alongside neurologic assessments and promptly communicate out-of-range values or deterioration through the stroke escalation pathway.
Keep in mind: The review compared several intensive targets and does not define one target for every patient. Follow facility protocol and patient-specific provider orders.

Key takeaways

  • The review included nine randomized trials and 4,381 adults after thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy.
  • Intensive systolic targets below 160 mmHg did not produce a clinically meaningful functional benefit.
  • Any intracranial hemorrhage was similar with intensive and conventional management.
  • Intensive management probably increased all-cause mortality, with a pooled risk ratio of 1.19.

Practice implications

  • Use the prescribed post-reperfusion target and the facility's stroke protocol rather than treating a lower systolic pressure as automatically better. Pair blood-pressure surveillance with neurologic reassessment and promptly communicate out-of-range values or clinical deterioration to the stroke team.

Limitations & cautions

  • The intensive targets varied across trials, including thresholds below 120, 140, and 160 mmHg; seven studies involved thrombectomy and two involved thrombolysis. Studies were mainly from upper-middle- and high-income countries, and certainty ranged from high to very low across outcomes.
  • AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.

Citations

Exact source links

Public citations are filtered to exact credible source pages. Homepage-only or invalid links stay in admin review and are not shown here.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (PubMed)

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (PubMed). Blood pressure management in reperfused ischemic stroke.

Open original source

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42445947/

Professional education only

This summary does not replace clinical judgment, facility policy, provider orders, or official guidelines. Verify practice changes against the original source and local protocol.

Related briefs

More updates for this clinical area

Back to Discover

Trauma, violence & abuse (PubMed)

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 20 emergency department studies encompassing 7,498 women found intimate partner violence was associated with a three-fold increased risk of suicide attempt, with psychological violence showing a stronger association than physical violence.

EmergencyPsychAI summaryReview source

Western journal of nursing research (PubMed)

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 38 studies including 19,033 patients identified clinical severity scales—specifically Modified Fisher grade and Fisher grade—and hemodynamic status as the strongest predictors of cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage.

EmergencyICUAI summaryReview source

Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society (PubMed)

A prespecified sex-specific secondary analysis of the PUSH-AHF trial in 310 patients found natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy increased 24-hour sodium excretion and reduced 180-day mortality or heart failure readmission in men, but not in women.

TelemetryICUAI summaryReview source