
Custom orthoses reduced diabetic-foot ulcer recurrence inconsistently across 10 trials
AI-summarized from the linked source. Educational brief, not medical advice.
Brief summary
A systematic review of 10 randomized trials involving 1,686 participants found that custom orthoses reduced diabetic-foot ulcer recurrence in several studies, but differences in devices and follow-up prevented a pooled effectiveness estimate.
What NurseJet pulled from the source
The review narratively compared medical shoes and custom insoles with usual care. One cited trial reported recurrence of 9.9% versus 25%, but results were heterogeneous and should not be treated as a universal effect for every orthosis or patient.
Why this matters for nurses
Wound-care nurses assess skin integrity, pressure exposure, footwear use, and adherence between visits. The review supports including prescribed orthoses in a recurrence-prevention plan while emphasizing that fit, consistent use, surveillance, and multidisciplinary follow-up remain essential.
Bedside takeaway
Prescribed orthoses may reduce recurrent diabetic-foot ulcers when fit, adherence, skin checks, and follow-up are addressed together.
How This Applies in Practice
Use this when: Caring for a person with diabetes and a healed foot ulcer who has prescribed therapeutic footwear or a custom orthosis.
On your shift
- Inspect the feet and orthosis for fit, pressure marks, moisture, debris, wear, and new skin or infection concerns.
- Confirm the prescribed wearing schedule and podiatry, wound-care, diabetes, or orthotics follow-up plan.
- Use teach-back for daily foot inspection and symptoms that require stopping device use and prompt clinical contact.
Key takeaways
- The review included 10 randomized trials and 1,686 participants at risk for recurrent diabetic-foot ulcers.
- Several trials favored custom orthoses or therapeutic footwear over usual care.
- Orthosis types, adherence, and follow-up periods varied across studies.
- Heterogeneity prevented a single pooled estimate of recurrence reduction.
Practice implications
- Inspect both feet and the device for pressure areas, skin damage, moisture, fit problems, and signs of infection. Confirm the prescribed wearing schedule and follow-up, reinforce daily self-inspection, and escalate new redness, blistering, drainage, odor, warmth, swelling, or breakdown.
Limitations & cautions
- The review used narrative synthesis because devices, comparators, adherence, and follow-up varied. The abstract gives one trial-level recurrence example rather than a pooled effect, so the magnitude of benefit cannot be generalized to every orthosis.
- AI-summarized from the linked source. Review the original article before applying to practice.
Citations
Exact source links
Public citations are filtered to exact credible source pages. Homepage-only or invalid links stay in admin review and are not shown here.
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research (PubMed)
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research (PubMed). Comparing the Effectiveness of Different Types of Orthoses in Preventing Diabetic Foot Ulcer Recurrence: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42541747/
Professional education only


